Revision not available in articles? #241

New issue

Open

opened 2019-04-15 12:00:50 +00:00 by tammoterhark · 2 comments

tammoterhark commented

2019-04-15 12:00:50 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

It seems that the revision mechanism is not available in articles. This would be highly appreciated.

matthijskooijman commented

2019-04-15 12:08:24 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

IIRC we left this out to keep things simple for a first version. If we add this, we have to consider how this will work. I think the revision should include the text, excerpt, sources, etc. but not (review) comments. How do revisions interact with status changes (e.g. does publishing an article generate a new revision? Does reverting to an older revision also change the status?).

Also, we have to see how this will work technically, since the current page revisions only contain the page text IIRC, and this needs additional components.

tammoterhark commented

2019-04-15 12:20:27 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I think we can help users enormously if we implement the revision structure
for just the body text for now.

The other elements are much smaller when in use and they are subject to
much less changes.

Op ma 15 apr. 2019 om 14:08 schreef Matthijs Kooijman <
notifications@github.com>:

IIRC we left this out to keep things simple for a first version. If we add
this, we have to consider how this will work. I think the revision should
include the text, excerpt, sources, etc. but not (review) comments. How do
revisions interact with status changes (e.g. does publishing an article
generate a new revision? Does reverting to an older revision also change
the status?).

Also, we have to see how this will work technically, since the current
page revisions only contain the page text IIRC, and this needs additional
components.

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/PlanBCode/hypha/issues/241#issuecomment-483225109,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGLtdeXbT1pMt7Tk0NVn5wNReyUHuHXiks5vhGu5gaJpZM4cvzK0
.

I think we can help users enormously if we implement the revision structure for just the body text for now. The other elements are much smaller when in use and they are subject to much less changes. Op ma 15 apr. 2019 om 14:08 schreef Matthijs Kooijman < notifications@github.com>: > IIRC we left this out to keep things simple for a first version. If we add > this, we have to consider how this will work. I think the revision should > include the text, excerpt, sources, etc. but not (review) comments. How do > revisions interact with status changes (e.g. does publishing an article > generate a new revision? Does reverting to an older revision also change > the status?). > > Also, we have to see how this will work technically, since the current > page revisions only contain the page text IIRC, and this needs additional > components. > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/PlanBCode/hypha/issues/241#issuecomment-483225109>, > or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGLtdeXbT1pMt7Tk0NVn5wNReyUHuHXiks5vhGu5gaJpZM4cvzK0> > . >

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

harmen/hypha#241

No description provided.

Rows
Columns